▼
Friday, July 31, 2020
Briefly mentioned ultimately.
Brief notes on youtube videos.
First this video.
Addressed immediately below.
https://youtu.be/HC2E8noNVUk
The whole human race is so hypocritical.
Presently.
It's a vicious circle of psychotic hypocrisies galore.
Presently on earth.
Really.
I see it every day.
And so
On that note I nowhave a question.
Before he ever met bathsheba
The biblical.man " david" was considered infinitely righteous before christ and god.
Seriously.
The christian s ruptures make that statement clear.
Despite the fact david had already had fornicating wild sex with at least 600 women.
Before his hooting and hollering wild passionate night of rabbitt freaking sex with bathsheba in this life.
So long ago.
Aw yes.
Before he ever met bathsheba david had already been a fornicating wild streaking sexy play boy king with at least 600 bewildered passionate women.
And that included wild sex with a biblical woman named Abigail.
Nabobs wife.
Whom david murdered by the way.
And then david just basically took abigail as his fornicating passionate concubine wife.
One of many.
Some willing.
Some not.
Regarding David's bed.
The bible does imply on that note abigail didnt really have a choice in the matter.
And the christian scriptures make it thoroughly clear that god approved of david doing that.
Too.
Just check em
They clearly do.
And god approved of david basically owing 600 women.
And fornicating wildly with such women.
For years.
.yeeee haaaaaaa!!
Shouted david.
The whole christian bible says david was righteous for doing that.
In fact the bible says david was gloriously righteous for doing that.
Before god.
Too.
And these women david seized were basically godlydevout women.
Generally speaking.
They weren't bartenders who dishonored the functions of what jesus says in matthew 5: 17.
Connected to psalm.
Which" according to christ is a hypocritical job in this life.
Neither does jesus praise hypocrites.
As matthew 24: 51 decrees.
Put it that way.
Albeit
The only time david failed god?
Was when he took bathsheba.
Because uriah " bathsheba' s honorable husband was righteous before god.
The bible doesnt say bathsheba was righteous.
The bible says god held it against david for taking bathsheba only because uriah was righteous before God.
So?
Think about that.
God clearly approved of david despite the fact david technically raped hundreds of women.
What's that?
Humans from this time are missing a huge piece of christianitys sacred puzzles.
On that note.
That's obvious.
Connected to luke 6: 26 of christianitys sacred scriptures.
Despite what self righteous devil women on earth decree for men.
That's why I'm warning humans on earth presently to read what I address here.
In 100 websites I forward to humans in this life.
Trust me.
Check em.
In connection to this.
Too.
Before c4q97 of the quatrains of nostradamus come to pass
I'm just warning earthlings on earth today of that..
Pure and simple
🤡now this video.
Addressed below.🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
https://youtu.be/lESpOYfBP-c
I like how everyone in the court room in the above video is portrayed as gloriously righteous above jesus christ.
Infinitely.
Except of course.
For the defendant.
Everyone's infinitely gloriously righteous above jesus.
In all these court rooms.
Proud and gloriously righteous.
Except for the defendant.
"" WERE ALL GLORIOUSLY RIGHTEOUS!!!!!"""
HOW COULD YE????
YE PIRCE OF FUCKUNG SHIT!!!!!"""
WOE MY FREAKING GOD!!!"""
KILL THE DEFENDANT NOW!!!
NO TRIAL!!!!
ARRRRRRRRRRHHHHHHHH!!!!!!"""
Loving it!!!
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Now this video.
https://youtu.be/AIp4hOzh-98
A manipulative person?
And mentally deranged?
That's what the judge said her opinion was?
Of MIT chell?🤡
My question?
Where is that evidence?
He sounded perfectly calm and rational..
Asking rational questions about the court case.
How is that psychotic?
The judge is the one who is sounding manipulative in that regard.
Not the defendant.
Try to make sense.
Okay judge?
Mitchel talks about his case.
And makes very rational points.
I mean very rational.
And a judge calls him insane or mentally unbalanced?
For making clearly rational comments.
That clearly have everything to do with the case.
And the judge discredits that?
Why?
That doesnt sound like the judge is being rational in that regard.
It sounds like the judge is mentally unbalanced here.
Not Mitchell.
That's totally obvious.
And
Wheres the evidence that he really killed anyone?
Mitchell young presented quite a few statements which would imply that theres reasonable doubt hes guilty.
Yet the judge really didnt present any real key statement that imply Mitchell's guilty.
So?
Guilty until proven innocent is what's happening here.
The court didnt mention a word of testimony that would imply or prove his guilt.
And Mitchell's lawyer sounds like an idiot.
Who neglected to raise some seriously important issues at Mitchell's trial.
What's that?
This is a charade of unjust shit decreed by this court.
Theirs no solid evidence that Mitchell's guilty.
Is there?
If their is " show me the evidence.
He was at the scene of a crime.
Sure.
But theirs no evidence he committed a crime.
That's the point.
American law is based on a certain slogan and precept.
Innocent til proven guilty.
And no real evidence was factually presented to decree mitchell guilty here.
ON A FEW OCCASIONS
The judge uses the expression " mitchell was convicted of first decree murder on various theories.
THEORIES?
DOES THE JUDGE KNOW WHAAT THE WORD ☆☆☆ THEORY☆☆☆ MEANS IN THIS LIFE?
THAT TOO RAISES DOUBT TO MITCHELLS GUILT.
INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.
THATS WHAT AMERICAN LAW STATES.
BUT THATS NOT THE CASE.
HERE.🤡
BECAUSE THE JUDGE HERE IS CORRUPT.
CLEARLY.
IN SUMMARY SHE IS.
AND so SHE should WEAR A CLOWN MASK.
IF SHEs GONNA BE CORRUPT.
LIKE THIS MASK HERE.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡and I want to see the judge receive a psychiatric assessment.
🤡🤡🤡before she is allowed to practise law in a court room any longer.
🤡🤡a psychiatric assessment sounds logical.🤡
That's the point.
Pure and simple.
https://youtu.be/mpWDTtjDShQ
Mitchell says he attempted to intervene.
And stop the killing.
He says that.
And theres no evidence whatsoever that "" that's an untrue statement.'""
That's the point.
Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
That's the basis of american law.
🤡
And there is no solid evidence which indicates mitchell is guilty.
He had blood on his pants.
The victims blood.
How does that prove hes the murderer?
It doesnt prove mitchell killed anyone.
But theres tons of evidence that imply the authorities mishandled Mitchell's case.
And the police and courts in unison avoided numerous specifics of the case which clearly imply mitchell is innocent of the charge of murder.
Their is much evidence implying that.
Factually.
.so wtf is wrong with court authorities here?
The court is clearly corrupt in doing this to mitchell.
That's obvious.
Mitchell is being framed here.
Obviously.
Look at the facts.
That's weird.
But it's TRUE.
Irrefutably hes being framed.
But why
How strange are these police authorities in this case.
